Search for: "Wells v. State Bar"
Results 581 - 600
of 14,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2010, 12:01 am
.): The Oregon State Bar dropped ethics charges against Judge Tichenor for his actions as a prosecutor. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am
In Cosmetic Warriors v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
Earlier today the Office of Enrollment and Discipline of the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced that the patent bar exam will be updated at some point in April 2011 to test material in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Edition 8, Revision 8, as well as other published USPTO policy and procedure reference materials. [read post]
2 May 2014, 9:27 am
Summary of Order April 23, 2014Order Suspending Attorney from the Practice of LawCase Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm
Bureau of Land Management (Administrative Procedure Act)United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:59 pm
Hesse v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
The case is entitled Chavira v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:43 pm
Read this post, which I published back in 2005, which related to Cantanella's continuing fights against the State Bar. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
We know all too well from California v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:41 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:30 pm
The complaint (full text) in Bella Health and Wellness v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
States have largely enacted their FCA laws to mirror the federal FCA, which bars tax claims (e.g., California, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Virginia). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:27 pm
Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
If King v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm
That question is pending before Judge Tanya Chutkan as an ancillary issue in the Doe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
Where a candidate was a member of the Maryland Bar for only five years, and practiced, albeit for a period of more than ten years, primarily outside of the State, he was ineligible to run for the office of the Attorney General in the primary election.In a companion case to Liddy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
