Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
The issue in NC Dental v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
Depression may not qualify as a disability Aldrup v Caldera, 274 F.3d 282 William A. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
It was conceded that on August 16, 1996, without a hearing, and as a result of the events which form the basis for the charges in this case, the Authority reassigned the respondent from a Level II supervisor to a Level I supervisor, with a significant cut in pay. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 12:40 pm
” Forrester v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:22 pm
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
In a thorough, thoughtful, and well-constructed opinion, the Ninth Circuit affirms, saying “When state actors enter that virtual world and invoke their government status to create a forum for such expression, the First Amendment enters with them. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 9:16 am
Smith called both his supervisor and the police. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
Housing Authority v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:29 pm
Supervisors not only deny or ignore their requests, they mock them for it. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:55 am
Goins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
The supervisor who created the guidelines also admitted she didn’t know what probable cause was and had never made a probable cause determination. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:02 am
Galeski v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:53 am
His additional “cat’s paw” claim was also unfounded, the Tenth Circuit held, rejecting the notion that the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Staub v Proctor Hospital established a categorical rule that, if a biased supervisor’s animus leads in any way to an adverse job action, an employer is liable. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:07 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Facebook Supervisor’s Post-Termination Access of Employee’s Gmail Account May Violate ECPA – Lazette v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
Just ask the employer in the case of Li v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:42 am
Oncale v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:16 am
I have a sense this isn't going to turn out so well. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Barnes v. [read post]
