Search for: "Wife B v. Husband B"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
The Applicable Law B. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Wife lived ‘hand to mouth’. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
LINDA MARIE BROGA, Appellee. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Income -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court abused discretion by imputing income equal to minimum wage for a forty-hour workweek to former wife, without considering her pay from Army Reserves, while including in husband's income his pension and disability benefits in addition to a full-time imputed minimum wage -- It was improper to consider former husband's secondary sources of income while… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:51 am
He is the husband I always wished he would be, and I in turn am trying to be the best wife I can be. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:21 am
Mikel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
Andews v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
After considering these principles and the thirteen factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5)(d) in determining the appropriate equitable distribution of the marital property of the parties (see Holterman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
While the Wife lacks sufficient income and property, the Husband has sufficient income to provide for her reasonable needs (see Poli v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm
For instance, a New Jersey court, also following the Restatement (Second) of Torts, concluded that the privacy element was not satisfied where a wife, at the behest of her hired investigators, placed a GPS tracking device in her soon-to-be ex-husband’s vehicle to investigate his `suspected infidelities. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
That sum must be further reduced by the maintenance award he is required to pay in the amount of $24,000 per year, as discussed below (see Domestic Relations Law 240[1-b][b][5][vii]; Rohrs v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
The plaintiff wife and the criminal defendant husband were married in January 1972. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
" (M.S. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Gonzalez, 262 AD2d 281; Silver v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
For instance, a New Jersey court, also following the Restatement (Second) of Torts, concluded that the privacy element was not satisfied where a wife, at the behest of her hired investigators, placed a GPS tracking device in her soon-to-be ex-husband's vehicle to investigate his `suspected infidelities.' Villanova v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:06 am
The 55- year old ex-husband was entitled to a hearing as to his continued ability to pay New Jersey alimony to the ex-wife, given (a) his involuntary retirement and (b) his greatly increased medical expenses. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 4:59 pm
Additional Resources: Lopez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
In the usual joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties between husband and wife, the survivor will always be able to disclaim one-half of the property. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In a concurring opinion, Justice David B. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Once such relevant Florida Supreme Court case is DMT v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:52 pm
In Hurwitz v. [read post]
