Search for: "Will Baude"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2018, 5:56 pm
” Third, Will Baude and Stephen Sachs’s positivist defenses of originalism rely at times on historical claims about what courts do. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:11 am
Rick Garnett suggested recently in this space that it is “obvious” (Rick’s word) that legal entities have Free Exercise rights, and Will Baude has written a bit more cautiously that churches “or the real parties in interest behind them” probably can assert their own first amendment claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am
Will Baude took a shot at an answer a month ago, in his post “How Could Surveillance Violate the First Amendment? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:17 pm
(Will Baude) Thanks to the ever-alert Chris Geidner, I saw this post-DOMA decision by a federal district court in Pennsylvania, which is a good example of how complicated the post-DOMA choice-of-law problems can be (and how hard it is to get them right). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:38 am
Back in 1996, like most people, I was using a 56k baud modem to dial into AOL in order to hook up to the internet. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am
(Will Baude) It’s not every day that you read a published appellate opinion that says “evidence at trial in this case was not sufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional element of the offense of conviction,” and then goes on to affirm the conviction. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:00 am
Apropos Will Baude’s post on the Michael Kinsley/Glenn Greenwald/Margaret Sullivan controversy, here’s a PrawfsBlawg post by Prof. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 11:03 am
I am alternately puzzled and exasperated by originalist scholars’ attitude towards eighteenth century history. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So I’ve explained why I reject two of the three possible approaches that federal courts take to the marital choice of law problem. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
Neverthelss, I think precedent is a bigger problem for originalism than co-blogger Will Baude acknowledges below, though for different reasons than Eric Posner discusses. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:41 pm
(Will Baude) The Third Circuit today split with the en banc Tenth Circuit (and less directly, some other courts) in rejecting a Free Exercise and RFRA challenge to the contraceptive coverage mandate. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Baud. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:03 pm
(William Baude, guest-blogging) So earlier this morning (yesterday, Eastern Time, which apparently governs the Volokh Conspiracy), I explained why the federal government does indeed need to look in large part to state law when it tries to figure out whether a couple is married. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm
William Baude says yes in this Washington Post article and Josh Blackman argues no in this Newsweek piece. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
(For program brochure click here) Our lecturers/speakers (in alphabetical order) will be Jack Balkin (Yale Law School), Will Baude (University of Chicago Law), Janice Rogers Brown (United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
Will Baude has written a column in the Washington Post, entitled Of Course the Supreme Court Needs to Use History. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman, however, believe Baude and Paulsen make numerous mistakes on their way to their conclusions and that their article "tells only one side of a complex story. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Of course it could, but Baude thinks too hard about it. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
In short, Baude and Paulsen punched a textualist ticket good for one ride on the Trump train. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Baud and Maxime St-Hilaire ‘Top 10 Employment Law Cases of 2016’ – Paquette v. [read post]
