Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)" Results 581 - 600 of 748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by TSLP
The Sports Law Professor came in 2139th place, in case you were wondering. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
But there is no compelling reason to introduce a “public figure” limitation in libel cases, as applies in the United States of America. (3) The defence of “truth” The burden of proving that what has been published is substantially true remains on the defendant. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:38 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains the background of the case as follows: On the afternoon of September 6, 2004, boys stole two bottles of mercury from an abandoned building, took this hazardous substance to a playground near the Rosemount Woods mobile home park, and released it while playing. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Steve Hall
And more broadly, they argue, it is a cautionary tale about the power of flawed science to sway a courtroom, and a glaring injustice that could affect debates over the fairness of the death penalty.That debate has been framed, in part, by a 2006 opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court, in which he said that the dissent in a case had not cited “a single case — not one — in which it is clear that a person was… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Andrew Voth
  Courts are increasingly spending more time analyzing the apportionment issue, and one often discussed case is Cornell University v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
Two, then, as to that latter requirement, the court says, no, it is not the case that a corporation meets the requirements of liability under the current state of customary international law or treaty law. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Two, then, as to that latter requirement, the court says, no, it is not the case that a corporation meets the requirements of liability under the current state of customary international law or treaty law. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 Two, then, as to that latter requirement, the court says, no, it is not the case that a corporation meets the requirements of liability under the current state of customary international law or treaty law. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
HART, CPA; and MOORE & HART, CPA, 6:09-CV-920;UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
: Since January 1, 2008 and through September 3, 2010, 283 banks have failed in the United States, and the total number of failed banks continues to grow. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
 The two settlements together resolve all outstanding compliance issues at the landfill facilities. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]