Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
[N.B. the daughter was unrepresented in Tennant.]As in Tennant, Lord Sumption declined to read the words of s.89(1) ‘a secure tenant dies’ as referring to anything other than a sole tenant.If the tenancy is a joint tenancy, the tenant has not died if there remains at least one living joint tenant in whom all the proprietary and contractual rights attaching to the tenancy subsist. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm
Janis Joplin sang, “Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:45 pm
Let anyone who doubts trace the word "gentleman" with the help of a concordance in the texts of Shakespeare's works as a whole. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:46 am
The Court of Appeals has ruled that an upstate New York school district had the right to censor a student's middle school graduation speech that included religious language from the New Testament.The case is A.M. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(the key word here being still). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
Lord Ken Macdonald QC, the former DPP, recently suggested that policing the accuracy of information on the internet is “an unmanageable task”. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
I use the word of EU law for this sort of situation". [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
As to Flaux J’s reliance on Securicor, it important to note that the appeal in Securicor was against a Court of Appeal decision which held that “where there had been a fundamental breach by a party to a contract, there was a rule of law which prevented him from relying upon any exclusion clause appearing in the contract, whatever its wording might be” (per Lord Diplock). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:20 am
Following the House of Lords case of Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group plc in 2003 and amendments to the discrimination legislation made that same year, ex-employees were protected against victimisation by their former employer. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Bokova v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 2032 (QB). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am
Lord Reed stated on behalf of all the justices that the starting point for the contractual interpretation is the words the parties used in condition 11.9(a). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The recent Tesla v BBC case ([2012] EWHC 310 (QB)) is a notable exception. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:38 am
Indeed, as Lord Hoffmann himself said in BCCI v Ali [2002] 1 AC 251 at 269, the primary source for understanding what the parties meant is their language interpreted in accordance with conventional usage. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
As in No. 1 West India Quay, the focus is on management services rather than litigation and, to adapt words of Rix LJ which Lord Neuberger quoted in Arnold v Britton, a decision in favour of Kensquare would involve “bringing within the general words of a service charge clause” something “which does not clearly belong there”. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
--Righthaven v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Such forwarding would equate to copying the cuttings internally or externally for wider dissemination, which the House of Lords decided did require a separate licence in NLA v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:48 am
This note confines itself to citing, without further discussion, the words spoken by Lord Justice Mummery at paragraphs 131 and 132 in his concurring judgment: "As Lord Reid observed in Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v. [read post]
