Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Only a higher court can say now whether there is more to s.98(4)(b) than Lord Simon of Glaisdale felt able to see in it in Devis v Atkins[1977] AC 931, which was a wide construction of “reasonably” (a formula which, with great respect, could be used to justify a band of possible decisions broad enough to encompass what a tribunal views as substantively inequitable and unmeritorious dismissals). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:29 pm
The last word from the Supreme Court of Canada on that subject is probably found in the Tercon case: Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
[73] However I am satisfied of their visual similarity because:(i) the Trade Mark and the sign complained of are composed of the same two words using the same letters in the same order;(ii) although the sign removes the space between the two words of 'Design' and 'Elements', unlike in the Trade Mark, the fact that they are two separate words is visually maintained by the capitalisation of the first letter of each word; and(iii) there is… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
So says the Court of Appeal in its reasons for decision in Biancaniello v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
See also Johnson v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
The Court of Appeal judgment refers back to Regeneron v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:09 am
Lord Justice Kitchin noted that, even if a three-dimensional shape is sold in conjunction with another registered trademark does not mean that the shape in itself will acquired distinctiveness, or, in other words ".. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
There was, inevitably, reliance on Lord Neuberger’s ‘warning in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7; [2009] 1 WLR 413, paras 46 & 50 that: “47. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
“You are doing the Lord’s work,” ABA News quotes Kagan as saying. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am
Upon joining the court, Ginsburg sent a letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, siding with Orthodox Jewish lawyers who objected to the year on their certificates of admission being worded as “The Year of Our Lord. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
Hence, on this view, the proper focus of blasphemy law should be on the words themselves and not on their effect of the words. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am
In the last couple of years there's been Led Zeppelin v Spirit and Marvin Gaye (the estate of) v Robin Thicke and Pharrell WilliamsAs a recent programme on BBC Radio 4 showed, there is a lot of activity in the area - with a new profession of forensic musicologist emerging as an important part of the picture. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Carmichael and Sefton BC (HB) [2017] UKUT 0174 (AAC) Oh my. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am
A similar exchange occurred with Actavis’ counsel and Lord Neuberger and the analogy of a dinner invitation stating “Come at 8:00 on 23 June”. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Having its origins in Lord Coke’s vocabula artis, the phrase term of art is common in law because the legal field has developed many technical words whose meanings are locked tight . [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:11 am
Summary judgment was also denied on the employee’s constructive discharge claim, and her claim for punitive damages (Creacy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
The words “meal ticket” do not appear anywhere in the speech, and Lord Wilson’s view is entirely consistent with the law as it presently stands, which requires judges to take into account all the circumstances before deciding on whether or not maintenance should continue and for how long / at what level: Another hot potato is the possibility under our current law for periodical payments to continue to be made by the husband to the wife for many years… [read post]
