Search for: "YOUNGER v. THE STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 1,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2019, 9:36 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000  Read More [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California in another case involving against Snapchat related to its Speed Filter – Lemmon v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 am by Joanna Buckley, Matrix.
During the course of this week the Supreme Court heard two cases involving the interpretation and application of article 1F(c) of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention) in Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2009/0036 and DD (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2011/0003. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in a follow-on case in Case C-427/06 Birgit Bartsch v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
He stated that most settle these claims before there is even a suit. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
The trial court’s decision granting summary judgment was reversed in part (Tilley v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
“Skadden’s Litigation Department is well known as a haven of ‘machismo’ where one’s worth is measured by how many nights one can go without sleep,” Gordon reportedly states in her complaint. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
D.B., in which the state is challenging a ruling that “eliminated statutory rape charges for juveniles younger than 13.? [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:07 am
State of New York Executive Dept.APPELLATE DIVISIONSECOND DEPARTMENTInsurance LawGBL §349 Claim Stated on Insurer's Alleged Practice Of Forcing Litigation to Prevent Coverage ForfeitureWilner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
The Judge held that the average consumer included people in the Jack Wills target group, namely younger people, but also included older people, including those who purchased clothes as gifts for younger people. [read post]