Search for: "Young v. Superior Court"
Results 581 - 600
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 3:05 pm
Or will it fizzle out fast, a la Young v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:21 am
Young filed a petition for review of the pretrial detention order in the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 7:00 am
The Arizona courts address this in a case called "Piner v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal. 3d 578. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:37 pm
Hat tip to my young - and learned - friend John Salloum for alerting me to para 28 of Leduc v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
S2618
SCHNEIDERMAN -- Relates to prosecution by superior court information following dismissal of an indictment or count thereof No Same asBLURB : CP L. rel to prosec by sup ct infLast Act: 03/16/09 referred to codesLast Action Date: 03/17/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 11:16 am
In Fred Brown v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Stong of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released the Guy v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
The court also found that the factors listed by the Kentucky Supreme Court in Moore v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
In Parks v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 11:16 am
No. 4057 Ontario Superior Court of Justice D. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Appeals Court sent the case back to Hampden Superior Court for the hearing. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The superior court found Brendlin had not been seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment because, up until the time of the arrest, "he was free to leave. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 pm
The Court of Appeals' NFP decision yesterday in the case of Ashley Ray Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
(Justice O'Connor did not actually reject that idea, since her point was that equality grounds sufficed to throw out the sodomy law in question, and that this narrower ground would not require the Court to overrule Bowers v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:41 pm
A unanimous three-judge panel of the California 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled on October 14 in Woods v. [read post]
