Search for: "pfeifer"
Results 581 - 600
of 604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
“Is this a big problem in the construction area? [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:37 am
“Are you not troubled by the fact that the trial court, rather than explaining the parameters of the Fifth, merely said, you’ll either testify or you will be held in contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, Pfeifer, Lanzinger and O’Neill. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The court had gone on, at para 29, to survey its previous case law, ending up with the statement in Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175, 183, para 35, that “a person’s reputation, even if that person is criticised in the context of a public debate, forms part of his or her personal identity and psychological integrity …”. 40 In the Karakó case the European court did not depart from that earlier… [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:58 am
“So, he’s not free to leave. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
“The risk-assessment determination made by the General Assembly in enacting R.C. 2923.13 does not undermine the rehabilitative purpose of the juvenile-justice system, nor does it give rise to the due-process concerns we were called upon to resolve in Hand. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices French, Kennedy, O’Neill, and Lanzinger No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Pfeifer and O’Donnell Key Precedent Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 2 (All political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
No: Justices Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Kennedy. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
“While we continue to characterize juvenile proceedings as civil rather than criminal in nature…the criminal aspect of delinquency proceedings is undeniable. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm
Furthermore, we know as a matter of law that the Art.8 ECHR right to private life contains a right to reputation (Pfeifer v Austria). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
In a 4-3 decision written by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Paul Pfeifer, Sharon Kennedy and Bill O’Neill, the court held that a child’s statement to his teachers about physical abuse constitutes testimonial evidence barred by the Confrontation Clause when the child has been found incompetent to testify. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am
The majority—Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Pfeifer and Lanzinger, plus Judge Carla Moore of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for the recusing Justice O’Neill–struck only the offending portions of the statute, leaving the rest to stand. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
“A non-capital defendant is afforded an appellate review that is not discretionary. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
“But what I am troubled with is at certain stages of these proceedings, there was a breakdown between the lawyer and the child. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
“Aren’t there rights of a mortgage holder to enforce a foreclosure independent of the note? [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
At Oral Argument Justice Pfeifer was absent from the oral argument, but the Chief announced he will be participating in the decision in the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor, and Justices Pfeifer, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and O’Neill. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:44 am
“Isn’t it a fact that the Bank does have an injury from the property taxes and insurance that they advanced under the mortgage alone? [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm
Related: LawNext Episode 7: Data-Driven Lawyering with LexisNexis Legal VP Jeff Pfeifer. [read post]
