Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 6,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2007, 5:11 pm
And Orin Kerr comments: "I find Bush's action very troubling because of the obvious special treatment Libby received. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 4:09 pm
UPDATE: Orin Kerr and Eugene Volokh both "find Bush's action very troubling because of the obvious special treatment Libby received. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:13 pm
My general grumpiness stems from thoughts similar to Orin Kerr's over at Volokh:Nonetheless, I find [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 7:33 am
(If you want newspaper editorials, here are divergent takes from the NYT, WSJ and WaPo; if you want law professors’ takes, here’s Orin Kerr on Volokh and Ellen Podgor on the White Collar Crime Prof blog.) [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:36 pm
As I argued earlier this year, Kerr believes Boumediene is in conflict (Kerr uses the professorial description of "tension") with Rasul: It is true that a divided panel of the D.C. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
U.S. (06-1196); William Glaberson of the New York Times reports here on the Court's decision to reconsider the appeals from two detainees; Bloomberg's Greg Stohr and Laurie Asseo have this article; Pete Yost of the Associated Press reports here; NPR has this coverage of the Court's reversal; and Orin Kerr weighs in here at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 12:06 pm
Yesterday, the Federalist Society held a webcast panel on the Supreme Court term, featuring co-conspirator Orin Kerr, my GMU law faculty colleagues Nelson Lund and Neomi Rao, prominent DC lawyers David... [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:34 pm
Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy highlights the excellent blogging regarding today's Supreme Court decision that students cannot be assigned to public schools because of their race. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:24 pm
Also: Kerr. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Orin Kerr has this initial post and these thoughts on the Court's new habeas exception at Volokh Conspiracy; Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences weighs in here. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:40 am
Orin Kerr's entry on the decision here. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:55 pm
For domestic evidence of accounting blog success, skeptics should look no further than From Greg’s Head, a blog started in early 2006 by Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
Frederick; Orin Kerr weighs in here. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:49 pm
As Orin Kerr predicted at the Volokh Conspiracy, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito appear to be judicial minimalists in the mold of Justices Harlan and Frankfurter rather than first-principle conservatives like Scalia, Thomas or Bork. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:28 pm
The panel's initial ruling, which Law Professor Orin Kerr criticized in this post, issued in August 2006. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Here are some early reactions to the Rita decision from sites on my blogroll: Lyle Denniston here at SCOTUSblog Mark Osler here at SCOTUSblog Steve Kalar here on the Ninth Circuit Blog Orin Kerr here at the Volokh Conspiracy Peter Henning here on the White Collar Crime Prof Blog Kent Scheidegger here on Crime and Consequences Feel free to comment on the commentary or to note other good blog analysis in the comments. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:12 am
Orin Kerr, who is expert in this area of the law, thinks this ruling is at higher than usual risk of being invalidated on appeal. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
United States, the E-Mail Privacy Case": At "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr says that this post will be the first in a series discussing the Sixth Circuit ruling that I first noted here earlier today. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
