Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2019, 10:14 am
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
After the Supreme Court decided Descamps v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:11 am
(Emphasis added) The Newest version of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure will shortly be available on the Arizona Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:37 pm
But about 5 years ago, the Arizona Supreme Court refused to buy the argument that convicted murderer James Hamm had sufficiently rehabilitated himself to be an Arizona lawyer. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Bennett, the Arizona matching funds case argued yesterday in the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
” The hearing will examine three of the Supreme Court’s most recent decisions, Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Despite the Supreme Court's comment in Fenwick v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:24 pm
In ruling unanimously to the contrary, the Supreme Court did the rule of law a good turn, argues Evan Bernick of the Center for Judicial Engagement. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:54 pm
What is a Frisk? [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
His attorney is now attempting to have the United States Supreme Court decide whether Title 38 U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:47 pm
The court held that 1) there are no Ex Post Facto Clause issues under the Supreme Court precedent of Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” Last Friday, a rare meeting of the Supreme Court Bar honored the memory of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:23 am
As it happens, the Supreme Court’s discussions of the permissibility of quarantines has been mostly in the preemption contexts, going back to the landmark dormant commerce clause case, Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
This raised the prospect of the courts ordering the Governor to proceed and the Governor saying something similar to what President Andrew Jackson allegedly said so many years ago about the Supreme Court of the United States: “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:20 am
More on the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:52 am
The US Supreme Court held that an officer must have "reasonable suspicion" that a criminal offense or traffic infraction has occurred in order to stop and detain a driver for investigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
The path to the Supreme Court was a winding one. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm
Oh, and that last part says that the legislature is to ensure that only the US Supreme Court can hear a challenge to a nullified law.Section 2, which is much longer, is an attempt to explain just what the Constitution means and how it is to be interpreted.What? [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court has distinguished, however, neutral and generally applicable law from laws that single out a specific religion for unfavorable treatment. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Aside from the coverage of the Court’s order in the Arizona case, the media’s focus has largely returned to Elena Kagan’s nomination. [read post]
