Search for: "Best v. Best" Results 5981 - 6000 of 41,836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
Organizations can do their best to defend against anticipated threats, but supply chain attacks such as on Colonial Pipeline and Kaseya VSA result in indiscriminate harm against which it is difficult to mitigate. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm by jordan
Again, the best course of action is to call Lulich Consultants & Attorneys to understand your duties and rights regarding real estate contracts. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm by Josh Blackman
[Re-upping a post I wrote with Seth Barrett Tillman in March] Governor Cuomo has now resigned. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am by Daniel
Controlled substances are categorized from most severe (Schedule I) to least severe (Schedule V) based on their potential for addiction, abuse, and physical or mental harm. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:28 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 10:44 am by Jonathan Pyzer
However, if someone feels a polite conversation will allow them to be on the way sooner, it might be in their best interest to do so. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
A recent appellate ruling by a Florida appellate court in Finlaw v Finlaw, resolving a dispute over the ownership of a partnership interest that a deceased partner devised by will to her grandson, presented an interesting twist on the same issue. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am by SW
  He also found that Magistrates Courts retain the power to adjourn further under s.54 of the 1980 Act, as Mr Justice Mitting found in Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis v Hooper (2005) EWHC 340 (Admin). [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 6:49 am by INFORRM
In the case of Reilly v Iconic Newspaper [2021] IEHC 490, a consultant engineer with the same name as a man who was banned from driving by an Irish court faces having to pay a costs bill running into six figures after failing in a bid to sue a newspaper over its report of the case. [read post]