Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 5981 - 6000 of 76,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Hearing Officer was guided by the CJEU’s decision in Case C-235/05 L’Oréal SA v OHIM (FLEXI AIR), which addressed the risk that consumers would believe that the slight difference between the signs reflected a variation in the nature of the products or stemmed from marketing considerations rather than assuming that the difference denoted goods from different traders. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by Albert Navarra
On September 26, 2011, the WCAB issued an en banc decision in Messele v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
  As the student post has described, the 9th Circuit recently held in Betz v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
If you were in Vegas a while back, and there was a guy at the craps table whispering to the dice, “C’mon, Daddy needs a good lawyer,” it might have been Bakari Ajumu; the court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
  The CJEU’s decision in Colloseum v Levi Strauss (Case C-12/12) provides a good example for such a case. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
By Livia Solaro While cultural heritage disputes have often proved heralds of international tensions, very few cases have caused quite the stir as the one revolving around Victorious Youth, a rare example of a life-size bronze statue from the classical Greek period. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
  This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:11 am by Daniel Corbett
  The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:37 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348 (2014) (precluding enforcement of PAGA waivers) was “wrongly decided” and no longer good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]