Search for: "IN RE CASE MINORS" Results 5981 - 6000 of 12,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2007, 10:03 pm
But, even if they're unwanted advances, that's the natural order of things, right? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:45 am by Howard Zimmerle
It will cover your minor cases and bumper tap cases, but if there is any significant injury at all – broken bones, herniated discs, torn ligaments, TMJ disorders, heck even an overnight hospital stay for observation, the case will be worth more than $20,000 and your assets could be on the line. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
  In the case, known as In Re Baby Z, the court also concluded that 1) the application for the adoption of Baby Z. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:35 pm by Kevin Funnell
It's because of the disparate impact on minority groups, regardless of the intent of the lender, that's the crux of the DOJ's case, isn't it? [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 3:08 am by Cari Rincker
  Where there is no familial bond among half-siblings, visitation is usually denied, as it was in the case of  In re Justin H., 215 A.D.2d 180 (1995). [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:48 pm by William D. Kickham, Esq.
  Massachusetts probation officers can be very aggressive about investigating whether or not a probationer is obeying and fulfilling the terms of his/her probation – and they won’t hesitate to re-call the case before a judge if they suspect a probation violation. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:00 pm by AccelerateEditor
We’re here to help you navigate the legal process and fight for the compensation you’re entitled to. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 3:36 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
A recent naturalization case from Virginia looked at an immigrant who got his green card, then committed a minor criminal violation, then applied for naturalization after that. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In his bench ruling VC Noble distinguishes his November 2009 decision in the Lola Cars case, where he granted dissolution based on deadlock, and he likens Gutchess to Chancellor Chandler's September 2008 decision in the Seneca case, where the court dismissed a minority member's dissolution petition involving a moribund LLC with a broad purpose clause. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:00 pm by Thomas Gallivan
For example, in a rear-end accident, you may think you’re just a little sore and will get better with rest. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The court followed Minnesota case law, which, like a number of other states (but not New York), generally prohibits a marketability discount except in “extraordinary circumstances” involving “wrongdoing on the part of the minority shareholder that has caused a reduction in the value of the corporation” or an “unfair transfer of wealth” — neither of which the court found applicable to the plaintiff. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The court followed Minnesota case law, which, like a number of other states (but not New York), generally prohibits a marketability discount except in “extraordinary circumstances” involving “wrongdoing on the part of the minority shareholder that has caused a reduction in the value of the corporation” or an “unfair transfer of wealth” — neither of which the court found applicable to the plaintiff. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Gareth Davies
One of Frontex’s tasks is to assist with returns, but it will not be expected to double-check every dossier and re-examine every decision taken. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 1:30 pm by Michael Grossman
We only take select cases and we litigate them; we're not a settlement mill. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But they’re not so bashful about American predecessors. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Then CBC case: running a fantasy baseball league is a core 1A value? [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
What is also telling about the facts of that case was that the gay couple in question were not living in New Farm or other well known suburbs where many gays live, but everyday suburban Ipswich. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm by Mike
Notably, this creates a conflict with In re Sonora Convalescent Hosp., Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm by Michael Grossman
The ideas behind §1983 is the premise that civil rights are important and that even a minor violation of these laws is unjust. [read post]