Search for: "In Re Steven" Results 5981 - 6000 of 6,046
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
Indeed, we're told that by departing before the end of 2006, he's in line to get about $5 million more than if he had waited. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 10:13 pm
  You're not a judge, you're not even a party to this case. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
Re-list Watch: The Court has now re-listed Skoros v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
. TODAY'S STORIES - December 11, 2006 Firm Leader Forecast: Mostly Sunny The American Lawyer In The American Lawyer's latest survey of the heads of Am Law 200 firms, 91 percent of respondents say they're optimistic about their firms' future -- the first time more than 90 percent of those surveyed gave that response. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 5:41 pm
The saga of who will represent re-indicted med pot movement martyr Ed Rosenthal just a got a little stranger. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 5:10 am
If you're looking for good (and very expensive) ideas for that special someone this holiday season, look no further than the list of lavish perks brokerage firm Jefferies used to woo business from Fidelity Investments traders, says The Boston Globe's Steven Syre. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
Stevens again asked for clarification about the different elements of Section 2. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 1:42 pm
Still crazy after all these years.John Paul Stevens-- Willie Nelson. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:43 am
He fends off Justices Souter, Breyer, and Stevens on this issue in pages 4-9 of the transcript. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Justice Ginsburg kicked off the Court's questioning, eventually asking whether petitioner's arguments would hold up under the Federal Circuit's most recent decisions on obviousness - In re Kahn, Alza Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 12:31 pm
(Once again, thanks Scott Stevens from the Baltimore County Law Library for this).If you're looking for webcasts for the Maryland legislature, you won't find any. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:05 pm
Members of the Supreme Court - especially Justices Stevens and Scalia - are very big on appeals to history. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
., instead of John Paul Stevens, then the Court's junior justice. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 8:43 pm
  Stevens' remark also reveals the justices' attitude toward the ordinary practice of judging cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 7:01 am
It has become self-parody: the network of poker, Stuart Scott and Steven A. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 9:26 am
"We're in a McCarthy era against people who don't accept Christianity," he said. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 10:39 pm
This VentureCast is over an hour long, so I hope you're going on a long run when you start this one. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 2:44 pm
In 2006 that strategy failed -- but by gum, they're going to give it another try over the next two years. [read post]