Search for: "Law.com"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 14,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 2:56 pm
Aruba Business Conference 2013 From May 5th till May 8th 2013 the trade mission “Europe meets the Americas” was held on Aruba. [read post]
8 May 2013, 1:56 pm
The Project The California High-Speed Rail Authority proposes to construct, operate, and maintain an electric-powered high-speed train system in California. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:20 am
In my continued effort to highlight judicial scrutiny of expert witnesses, reason for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Kamloops Registry, rejecting an expert psychiatric opinion. [read post]
7 May 2013, 7:51 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week by by BC Supreme Court, Chilliwack Registry, addressing the issue of implied or express owner consent following a motor vehicle collision involving an impaired driver. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:25 am
In yet another example of a personal injury claim being undermined by postings on social media, reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, demonstrating a Facebook posting undoing a claimed damage. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:41 am
The North Carolina Department of Transportation issued an update for the highly controversial Monroe Bypass project. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:27 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week with the BC Supreme Court citing Wikipedia when assessing damages following a motor vehicle collision. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:59 am
Michelle Corvi, at Law.com. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:23 am
— from Law.com The Mayo Clinic and Healthcare Social Media — from SocialFish The “Employee Tricked Me Into Firing Her” Defense — from Social Media Employment Law Blog NLRB Issues Facebook Firing Decision — from Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space “Catfishing” Gets Its First Legal Mention — from The Not-So Private Parts If a Tweet falls in the forest — from iFractalHR & Employee Relations Workplace Violence, Part 2: Crisis… [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:00 pm
Which court is competent to hear the case? [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:04 am
Adding to this ever growing database of case comments criticizing expert witnesses for advocacy, reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, rejecting the evidence of an orthopaedic surgeon hired by ICBC and providing critical comments about his courtroom testimony. [read post]
2 May 2013, 4:46 am
Several weeks ago law.com published a story Orrick's Next Act contained the following comment: "some partners worried that the firm's embrace of alternative fee arrangements gave the impression that it was moving down market." [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
As Law.com’s Corporate Counsel explains: The court sent the case back to the district level for more discussion of whether eBay may be guilty of false advertising because it promotes the presence of “Tiffany” products on its site in both direct advertisements and paid ads that pop up when users search for Tiffany on Google and other search engines. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:20 am
If an injured plaintiff inaccurately describes the forces of a collision to physicians that can work to undermine the foundation of subsequent medico-legal reports and strike at the foundation of a personal injury claim. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
It is well established that social media postings and other electronic ‘records’ can be relevant in injury litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:17 am
Reasons for judgement were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, addressing the responsibility of transit operators to drop their passengers off at a safe location. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:33 am
The post KONINKLIJK ALS HET KAN…. appeared first on Karel's Legal Blog. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:13 am
Legal research service/ publisher, Fastcase, has released its own new software version to identify overturned or reversed case law in its "Authority Check" application, Law.com's Law Technology News yesterday reported. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:53 am
Last year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that ““…the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery…” and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada’s reasons in FH v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Everything boils down to knowledge and experience Litigation appears to be simple. [read post]
