Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 5981 - 6000 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm by David Lat
Lithwick begins by discussing the controversies brewing over calls for various justices to recuse themselves in Florida v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert  In the Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:04 am
In the motion, the drug companies argued that under the Supreme Court's decision in Pliva v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
When Blackstone declared in 1769 that the liberty of the press consisted in placing no previous restraints upon publications, he was not laying down a new principle of constitutional theory, but merely stating what he believed to be the existing law. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am by Dave
The "new" housing strategy published today, Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England, has some interesting bits to it, but it is somewhat unfortunate that the government has taken the opportunity to trumpet its achievements and pronounce their success in this document without proper, close evaluation. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am by Dave
The "new" housing strategy published today, Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England, has some interesting bits to it, but it is somewhat unfortunate that the government has taken the opportunity to trumpet its achievements and pronounce their success in this document without proper, close evaluation. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:47 am by tracey
Regina (Garland) v Secretary of State for Justice and another: [2011] EWCA Civ 1335;  [2011] WLR (D)  333 “Under rule 53(1) of the Prison Rules 1999 prison authorities were allowed a full 48 hours from discovery of an offence against discipline to lay a charge against a prisoner, and longer where there were exceptional circumstances making it impossible to lay the charge within that time.” WLR Daily, 17th November 2011 Source:… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:41 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The court, however, insisted to an embarassing degree on some particular facts , and thus casted a doubt on the scope of the rule it was laying down. [read post]