Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2007, 6:45 am
Hampton and Gena B. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
GAO wrote that “[t]he Small Business Act . . . gives the SBA, not our Office, the conclusive authority to determine matters of small business size status for federal procurements. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:06 am
The whole matter of restoring the Everglades is, from what I can tell from these filings, really complicated and involves science and phosphorous levels and a case about a permit before Judge Middlebrooks that I don’t even want to get into. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:45 am
§ 363(b)(1). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
It wouldn't be surprising if the RCJ is bursting at the seams with appeals and JRs on mandatory possession proceedings. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:37 am
After the third party is joined, Rule 4:8-1(b) declares that [t]he plaintiff, within 45 days after being served with the third-party complaint, . . . may amend the complaint to assert any claim against the third-party defendant arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of plaintiff’s claim against the third-party plaintiff; thereafter plaintiff may so amend the complaint only by leave of court on notice to the parties to the action. . .… [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
R.C. 4511.19(a)(1)(b) to (a)(1)(k) make it illegal to operate a vehicle with prohibited concentrations of alcohol in one’s blood, breath, or urine. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
You can't make this stuff up, folks. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:36 pm
(See 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1(b)) But don’t wait until day 89 or even day 29. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:22 am
Bank filed only one deficient packet in this matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 12:23 pm
Survive or avoid a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, get into discovery, and then seek a settlement either before a summery judgment motion, or after surviving one. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:21 am
Rice, 483 F.3d 1079, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007) (“[B]ecause passengers present a risk to officer safety equal to the risk presented by the driver, an officer may ask for identification from passengers and run background checks on them as well. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 9:58 am
We can't ignore them. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
You can read the full post about Church Homes (d/b/a Avery Heights) v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:33 am
See El T. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:30 pm
The event will be at 7:00 p.m. tonight, October 11, 2010, Stamp Student Union, Benjamin Banneker B room, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:20 am
We can’t ignore them. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
Privacy Disputes across the Atlantic"Judith Rauhofer, "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you: Legislative developments in relation to the mandatory retention of communications data in the European Union"Caroline B Ncube, "Watching the watcher: recent developments in privacy regulation and cyber-surveillance in South Africa"Ralf Bendrath and Rikke Frank Jørgensen, "The World Summit on the… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Surely Mexican Restaurant Chains B-G must be wondering why Restaurant A has lacked the courage to step up and say, yes, it’s us. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Note that it doesn't matter if the driver is impaired by alcohol--he/she can still be liable if his/her BAC of .08 or above. [read post]
