Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 5981 - 6000 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
  So, although the case came out correctly in the end, it took a review by the United States Supreme Court to get it right. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
 Despite the uncertainty around the long-term success of NFTs, we have certainly seen a “land grab” from brands filing trade marks, including ITV (for LOVE ISLAND), Heineken and even The Empire State Building [Katpost with details from Becky Knott here]. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:21 am
" Yet Ramadan had been banned from entering the United States since 2004, when his visa had been revoked. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Mark Joseph Stern suggests that Justice Elena Kagan’s majority opinion in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
In a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the Florida Supreme Court concluded that the statute violated the United States and Florida constitutions. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:02 am by Lawrence Taylor
  The United States Supreme Court thereafter reversed the state court. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
There was much argument around the claim because the claim just stated the name of the enantiomer, just as some claims merely state the name of the virus or gene or protein. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Abbasi) (January 18; granted October 11): Whether lawsuits by Middle Eastern men, who were present in the United States illegally when they were arrested and detained for immigration violations after the September 11 attacks, against government officials can go forward, when the lawsuits allege that the officials knew that “they were subjecting individuals with no ties to terrorism to unnecessary and punitive conditions of confinement. [read post]