Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 9,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Thursday in Ap-Fonden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
District court: Which it does. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:01 am
First, courts have long held that sovereign states can sue in American courts for any reason whatsoever. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:10 pm
Supreme Court cases: District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:33 am
Banta v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:07 am
Supreme Court in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
The recent Bruesewitz vaccine preemption case involved a split between a federal appeals court (the Third Circuit) and a state supreme court (Georgia).So while, short of a U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm
” First, the court noted that judicial restraint in interpreting the reach of criminal statutes reflects deference to Congress and a concern for fair notice about the content of the law. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia for “a necessary second level of judicial permission to begin combing through the records. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
Fazaga The district court dismissed several of the plaintiffs’ claims after the Government argued that the “state secrets” doctrine prevented litigation. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States… [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:37 pm
" United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
First, in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Decision California’s Marriage of Cassinelli (2016) 4 CA5th 1285, 210 CR3d 311, a decision reached by our own Fourth Appellate District, Division Two in Riverside, is now published and citable per California’s Judicial Council (but note that a Petition for Certiorari is presently docketed with the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:29 am
Well, the first case on the list is Watson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
Your state's law may vary, but we're hoping that DePriest becomes the first of many. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:40 am
RFAC states this explicitly at § 682.03(7), Florida Statutes, which provides, “[i]f the court orders arbitration, the court on just terms shall stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim subject to the arbitration. [read post]
