Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
PTE Ltd v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 10:27 am
The JLVRAA would restore the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 to its fullest strength and undo the harm created by Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Saint-Gobain manufacturers such crystals under a license with another patent holder. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Chambers); and Tetz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Lee Tawes III v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 7:06 pm
See, e.g., Corwin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
In paragraph 43, the CJEU explicitly stated: “Accordingly, having regard to the objectives pursued by Regulation No 469/2009, the claims cannot allow the holder of the basic patent to enjoy, by obtaining an SPC, protection which goes beyond that granted for the invention covered by that patent. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am
Hence, there is one available visa in the India EB-3 skilled worker, otherwise it would have stated “Unavailable. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
AG Holder: Assassination is unlawful. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am
The first was a March 2017 ruling in Leonard v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:43 am
” While the Abdullahi v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
In the 2014 case of Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Noting the recent K-Dur decision, the brief goes on to argue that “California law does not permit a patent holder to exclude competition with a naked cash payment so large it casts serious doubt on the patent’s legal ability to exclude. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:57 am
Macy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
In Holder v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am
The three men – Muhummad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari – are all U.S. citizens or green card holders. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:39 am
The social media tycoon stated “Our platform policies require third parties to have the necessary rights from applicable rights holders. [read post]
