Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 5981 - 6000
of 6,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
The relators’ attorney, Robert L. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
Smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer. b. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:32 am
in Karambelas v Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Russell L. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
” B. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Household Int’l, Inc. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:49 am
By: Charles B. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
(1-B) The presence of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail shall be obligatory at the time of final hearing of the application and passing of final order by the Court, if on an application made to it by the Public Prosecutor, the Court considers such presence necessary in the interest of justice. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
