Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 5981 - 6000 of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
A board-certified orthopedic surgeon, testified that petitioner's MRI showed "significant damage to the spinal column with multiple level herniations." [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am by Sophie Corke
 Reviewing 'Patent Management – Protecting Intellectual Property and Innovation', Kat friend Gustavo Schötz (Intellectual Property Center, Universidad Austral, Argentina, and Schötz & Viascán) recommended it as a business-focused roadmap to making best use of intangible assets.Trade MarksKat friends Chia Ling Koh and Lyndon Choo described the jurisdiction-dependent role of a trade mark in the context of a passing off claim following a recent decision of the… [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:17 pm
A board-certified orthopedic surgeon, testified that petitioner's MRI showed "significant damage to the spinal column with multiple level herniations. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:32 am by SHG
The United States Supreme Court issues its long-awaited decision in Elonis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am by Nassiri Law
You probably have longer for state-level claims, but these aren’t “wait and see” situations. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:48 pm by Frank Heft
The district court held that reckless offenses qualified as violent felonies and the Sixth Circuit affirmed citing United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am by Guest Bloggers
First, Davis endorses the use of Pike balancing for state tax obligations and even indicates that state taxation is a quintessential local function worthy of a high level of deference under the test. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
Wilburn v McMahon, 296 AD2d 805, is an example of such a disciplinary action.In Wilburn, a New York State Trooper, Douglas A. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 10:04 am by Scott T. Allen
” The OFCCP states that the directive is intended to update federal policy to incorporate recent developments in the law articulated in Supreme Court decisions, including Burwell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:43 am by David Canton
The Jones decision stated that: It is appropriate for this court to confirm the existence of a right of action for intrusion upon seclusion. [read post]