Search for: "VI"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 13,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
Specifically, a company may earn a reduced fine if it can demonstrate: (i) the commitment of senior management, (ii) policies and procedures applicable to employees and third parties, (iii) compliance training, (iv) periodic reviews of the program’s effectiveness, (v) various internal controls, (vi) whistleblower channels and protections, (vii) disciplinary measures, (viii) due diligence procedures, and (iv) specific procedures related to public sector interactions. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:07 am
Duress vi. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:07 am
Duress vi. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:07 am
Duress vi. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:49 am
An important requirement for a direct action by the shareholder suffering derivative damage, is that the wrongdoer committed a tort vis-à-vis the shareholder (i.e., violated a specific duty of care towards that shareholder). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Unwed fathers in most states do not have the same rights as unwed mothers vis-à-vis their children. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:14 pm
Assertions that plaintiffs “overpaid for the products at Neiman Marcus because the store failed to invest in an adequate security system” or that the “loss of [customers’] private information, which they characterize as an intangible commodity,”[vi] constitutes an injury-in-fact were met with skepticism. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 1:26 pm
The first featured item listed for purchase on american-bowhunter.com is a $78 arrow-retrieval kit, including “Retriever Pro Reel, Mounting Hardware, 25 yards of 200# Hi-Vis Braided Dacron line, 2 AMS Safety Slide Kits and Operation and Instruction Booklet for Mounting to your bow. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
This post examines an opinion issued in a case in which a woman – Chantay Sewell -- sued “her former boyfriend, . . . [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:24 pm
Accordingly by the extended order HHJ Mackie had effectively deprived Mr Gopee and the applicant companies of their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions and protection of their properties contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998. vi) The extended order was accordingly made without jurisdiction, or in excess of jurisdiction, without any valid justification. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
” Plaintiffs argued that Shopkick’s description of the process was not accurate vis a vis the version of the app at issue in the lawsuit, but Shopkick offers evidence to this effect (which goes unrebutted). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 60 [week ending on Sunday 23 August] - Test-drive of the Unitary Patent Court, Parts V and VI |From food porn to porn with food: passion with Parmesan | USPTO Guidelines on patent eligibility | Red Bull fends off Crazy Bull in Greece | Biker Biker Biker Gang! [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
The article will then investigate the precise scope of the country of origin’s obligations vis-à-vis its fleeing citizens, particularly with respect to return and reparations. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:02 pm
[vi] 16 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) recently overturned the decision of a Certifying Officer (CO) to deny labor certification for the position of “Production Supervisor. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:53 am
The institutions of transnational criminal law:What are the institutions that have defined specific practices in transnational criminal law and what role do they play vis-à-vis other national and international organizations? [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Deborah J. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
Here's a post from recent guest Kat Suleman Ali on a topic that touches the heart of patent protection.A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part VI At the hearingMore of the same from Bristows. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
Under Article VI, Section 33 of the New Mexico Constitution, a district judge elected to that... [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:19 am
Even more interesting, the court's holding ultimately did not change Powell's criminal history category: his score dropped from 20 to 15, leaving him in category VI. [read post]
