Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5981 - 6000 of 6,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Kurt Bassuener
The inability of these intransigents to agree on how to implement the Court’s first such decision in 2009 in Sejdić and Finci v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
[and] . . . it allows the voters to retire officials for any reason whatever which seems satisfactory to the electorate. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
If the voters return a disqualified defendant to elective office it is because where in doubt, it is the voters, not their agents in Congress, who should have the last word. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm by Stephen Halbrook
The Constitution of 1950 was approved by the voters at the general election that year. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, this conflicts with the Supreme Court’s precedents (such as City of Ladue v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade in the Guardian also criticised the press and politicians for leaving voters in a ‘factual fog’ over the upcoming EU referendum. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Julie Suk, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It (University of California Press, 2023).Julie SukMany thanks to Jack Balkin for hosting this symposium on After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do about It, and to Paula Monopoli, Deborah Dinner, Victoria Nourse, Katharine Young, and Linda McClain for their comments and questions which are as generous as they are challenging. [read post]