Search for: "Washington v. People"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 6,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
Eugene V. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
I attended oral arguments in the case Snyder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am
{In Hess v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 4:04 pm
"] From Godlewski v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:04 pm
., Jacquier, V., Boyen, F. and Verbrugghe, E., 2024. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
As a woman, Haley is uniquely positioned to bring back to the GOP those republican women who have been alienated by the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 12:30 pm
It's going to be super swell, and some important people will be there. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Let’s talk about Easha’s first case, Murray v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 2:59 am
Yet in case after tragic case, the American people have witnessed first-hand the disastrous consequences of illegal, pernicious discrimination that has prioritized how people were born instead of what they were capable of doing. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
Ezra Klein’s article in the Washington Post was also long. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
The Washington Post did a not-to-be-missed riff on this with style and beauty pointers from every president throughout history. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:04 pm
Not one of three lawyers who argued in Samantar v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
[et al.].Washington, D.C. : [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
Washington DC: Public Health Foundation, pp. 85-97. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
See, e.g., the Fourth Circuit's recent opinion in PETA v. [read post]
