Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
The problem was that the new law Congress passed back in 1996 greatly limiting habeas requires that a defendant have exhausted his remedies in state court on each issue; if you don’t raise it in state court, you’ve “defaulted. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
Defendant: Code is speech! [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:37 pm
If you don't know it, you will not be able to follow any really sophisticated discussion about intention. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
I don't see in the constitution where it says once you're a diocese in the Episcopal Church Province, we own you, and you can never leave. . . .MR. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
" In practice, I expect that today the jurisdictions that currently don't have statutory provisions generally allowing carrying (California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and D.C.) would, when forced to choos [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:34 am
Having spent 25+ years with attorneys, judges, mediators and arbitrators, I simply can't assume bias. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 5:48 pm
Don't get me wrong, I will change back the second this doesn't work, and I will defend to the death the right of every other obssessive compulsive student to furiously transcribe their lectures. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:49 am
" As they say, we report, you judge. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
—But that a distinction between A and B can be drawn doesn't mean that enough future judges will be persuaded by this distinction. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
We'll turn primarily to Shetler and post illegal-search statements, but Valenzuela-Espinoza (discussed below) deserves a close read as well. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:55 am
If your user agreement doesn’t include a “don’t infringe” clause, you should add it pronto….and perhaps think of other opportune places to reiterate the “don’t infringe” message to users. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
Sound reasoning and policy won't necessarily stand in the way of a decision stripping defendants of their protections. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
"The courts have pretty much decided that if you don't have a cognizable case of current harm you are not going to be able to receive damages," Pierson noted. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
We all have beliefs as to the truth or falsity of information we receive. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:23 am
But, I don't get it: why is the knowledge that someone is a falling-down drunk worse than the fact that one is a falling-down drunk. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
I don't know what advice to give you as you set out on your journey. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 1:10 am
You don't put the child through that. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:19 am
He can't execute the powers of his office. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
“Naturally we don’t want to go anywhere. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
Still, given that this was a capital case, I don’t really have a problem with the result. [read post]
