Search for: "Weeks v. Weeks" Results 5981 - 6000 of 67,005
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
For this last week, the most-consulted three English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
The seminar format is to read 6 books, taking 2 weeks on each book, with the author coming to the class during the second week to discuss the book. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm by Stephen Rosenberg
This case from last week out of the Second Circuit passes that bar, although possibly by not that much. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:16 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
” (Hopefully, you’ve also read last week’s post as well.) [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:14 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm by Alexandra Megaris
But the FTC’s case is less about footwear than it is about the imaginative ways the agency continues to find ways to pursue monetary relief in the wake of AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 15/6/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 8 June 2022 there was a directions hearing the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe before Collins Rice J. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Cary Coglianese
In the weeks leading up to the Kisor decision in 2019, speculation abounded that the Court might overturn its earlier decision in Auer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
In a webinar last week (.. admittedly before the later White House statement earlier this week, described below), CBP’s Elva Muneton said, “It’s important to know that the level of evidence that’s going to be required by the Uyghur act is very high. [read post]