Search for: "Young v. Ins*"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 7,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2018, 7:13 pm
One of the most important of those was the precedent set in the 2000 case of Brooks v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
More importantly, ‘online safety’ is not limited to issues like solicitation, age-inappropriate content and bullying - I would argue that is is necessary to consider other issues like privacy, commercial targeting, censorship and data mining as part of a holistic approach to the safety of young users. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:18 am
Lopez challenged that condition in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
In 2020, the appeals court reaffirmed this double standard in Lopez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 1:12 pm
See Baxter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
Ruling in favour of the firm in Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group Neuberger said that “something is out of kilter” when the firm had managed to amass costs of £75,000 when its client, plumber Adrian Simcoe, had received a £12,500 settlement for a personal injury claim. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:29 pm
This doctrine was first recognized in the landmark 1920 case of Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:23 am
Insider Trading: The SEC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am
" In a subsequent email, the defendant stated, "by underage, I meant legally permissible but young. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:26 am
In this week’s case (Dobre v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:18 am
The court, however, dismissed the employee’s sex discrimination claim, finding it duplicative of his hostile work environment claim (Rachuna v Best Fitness Corp, May 5, 2014, Mitchell, R). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
Supreme Court reaffirmed the above principles in EEOC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 10:41 am
As noted in the 2001 Florida Supreme Court decision of Clampitt v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals Ruling Most recently, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals ruled on the reasonableness of a non-solicitation agreement, in the case Manitowoc Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:18 am
After making contact, predators often build on the relationship by sending gifts or gaming currency, such as V-Bucks in Fortnite. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:15 am
” Outside of Baylor, he is a Texas Bar Foundation fellow, a member of the State Bar of Texas Local Bar Services Committee, a barrister in the Judge Abner V. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 7:37 am
She said she had no choice but to sue – and name her young nephew as the defendant. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]