Search for: "Young v. State" Results 5981 - 6000 of 8,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
" The plaintiff (not technically, but in reality) is a young boy with a nasty, invariably fatal condition - Duchenne muscular dystrophy. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:28 am by WSLL
The Court cited recent decisions in Brown v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 4:27 am by Daniel Schwartz
City Sheriff Was Not an “Employee” Entitled to Statutory Protection  In Young v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Reports that American troops were ordered to ignore Afghan troop abuse of young boys sparked justified outrage. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
  “Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:13 am by Russ Bensing
  The first was the 11th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]