Search for: "Young v. State" Results 5981 - 6000 of 8,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 3:01 am by Matt DeVries
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in the closely watched case of Sackett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
Beer had stated in cross-examination that “there was obviously an agenda” in relation to allegations of corruption. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Joshua Beau Taylor, Student Director, and Benjamin J. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
   The man claimed he was a victim as a young boy of that priest’s abuse. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:27 am by Rebecca Anderson
“I believe in the next five years we’ll see that law in every state, shifting the paradigm of seeing young people as victims, not criminals. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Steve Hall
The Rape Case: A Young Lawyer’s Struggle for Justice in the 1950s, by Irving Morris, tells us at least as much about its author as it does about the facts of the underlying case, which concerned an encounter between an unnamed young woman and three young men in Wilmington, Delaware’s Woodlawn Park in the early hours of October 30, 1947. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm by Andrew Koppelman
” (15) But the brief also has so many citations to United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:51 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]