Search for: "Case v. People" Results 6001 - 6020 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
After the parties had briefed and argued the case, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Jennifer Dalven
The case was filed by an organization known as Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which has been labeled a hate group, and helped write the Mississippi law which the Supreme Court used to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She is a legend, going back to her work on the LCO treaty rights cases in Wisconsin, the LeBlanc matter in Michigan, and United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:59 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
However, in 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:33 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The consolidated cases decided this week by the Michigan Supreme Court, known as People v Carp, et al, squarelyaddressed the narrow issue of whether the SCOTUS ruling in Miller should be applied retroactively.If Miller's ban on mandatory life sentences for juveniles is applied retroactively, then the 350 juvenile lifers in MDOC prisons would have a shot at parole. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Simmons and of people of any age for crimes against individuals other than murder last year in Kennedy v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The question arose in the case of Getup Ltd. v Electoral Commissioner [2010] FCA 869, whether this signature could be electronic, and if so, what kind of e-signature would be satisfactory. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
LEXIS 30 (February 12, 2009): [*P10] In the instant case, just as in Jacobsen, Mithun, and State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:32 am by Transplanted Lawyer
So it could very well be the case that most of the really good evidence we've got against, say, Khalid Sheik Mohammed will be excluded from any court. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The most closely watched case of the week was Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]