Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 6,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
Related merchandise: characters on cereal bowls and T-shirts, etc. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
This latter particular reason for anonymity irks Fish, who argues that Justice Stevens went astray in his majority opinion in McIntyre v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
In a recent presentation, representatives from People’s Law School stated that within nine months, 80% of users find Beagle+ to be helpful, and that usage of the chatbot is up by 60% (with the tool now reaching 600 British Columbians a month). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
See McKoy v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
” Hewitt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
See NRS 241.030(3)(a), and Goldberg v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
For example, in the 1914 case Harris v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Eventually, the employee received a Record of Employment from 260 stating that she was employed from November 6, 2017 to December 13, 2017. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law explicitly provided?] [read post]
