Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 6001 - 6020 of 99,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 12:29 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court affirmed by a vote of 5-4. [read post]
The state then appealed to the Texas Supreme Court, which rendered its decision late last month. [read post]
Supreme Court Decision The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the NLRA did not preempt Glacier’s tort claims. [read post]
Supreme Court Decision The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the NLRA did not preempt Glacier’s tort claims. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:19 am by Jeff Welty
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), the Supreme Court considered a case where one prosecutor failed to disclose to the defense that another prosecutor had made a promise of leniency to a key witness in exchange for the witness’s testimony. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
In all, I found about 700 seemingly legitimate U.S. libel case orders submitted to Google for takedown and then forwarded to the Lumen Database from 2012 up to mid-October 2016. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:33 am by Microjuris PR
Supreme Court Ignores National Origin Race-Based Inequities in Citizenship and Sovereignty for Puerto Ricans and others born in U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by help@sandbergphoenix.com
On June 1, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued an 8-1 decision wherein it concluded that federal labor law—that is, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)—did not preclude an employer from suing a union for damages in state court in Washington. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Ashley Deeks, Matthew Waxman
The Supreme Court has offered snippets of its view on this in some cases, stating in Fleming v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:06 pm by Christopher J. Walker
As the Supreme Court suggested two years ago in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The court granted the plaintiff’s preliminary motion without oral argument finding that AB 979 constitutes a racial quota and imposes a fixed number of board positions exclusively for certain minority groups, thereby clearly violating Supreme Court precedent. [read post]