Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 6001 - 6020 of 16,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2016, 11:43 am by Jonathan H. Adler
It’s nice to see that the president of GMU understands these principles, even if a majority of the GMU Faculty Senate does not. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 1:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In order to prevet enforcement of a rule the Administration does not support, the EPA issued a rule purporting to "suspend" the effective date of the WOTUS rule so as to allow time for the adoption of a new definition. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” I suppose it’s a good thing David Wheeler is not a defense attorney, for he clearly does not understand how our justice system works. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” (“Hören Sie auf, mir die Beschreibung vorzulesen ! [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
[H]e offered to have an independent expert confirm that he deleted information from his home computer and Dropbox. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 8:47 pm
   For example, if the trustee is a child of the first marriage, insure that the second spouse has the right to remove that trustee if he/she does not pay for the convalescence expenses of the second spouse. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Barnet is one (and apparently H&F thanked Barnet for their assistance in devising H&F’s allocation policy. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Barnet is one (and apparently H&F thanked Barnet for their assistance in devising H&F’s allocation policy. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am by Kristine Knaplund
  In construing subsection (e) together with subsection (h), he argued, there was no need for Congress to refer to subsection (h) in Section 416(e) because subsection (h) specifically says it applies to the entire subchapter, including subsection (e). [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Before viability, the state can regulate abortion as long as it does not impose an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:13 pm by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
Cir. 1998) (“the protected conduct element of a [§ 3730(h)] claim does not require the plaintiff to have developed a winning qui tam action before he is retaliated against”); United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:25 am by Zachary Spilman
Specifically, at some point on the night in question, Appellant (the company first sergeant), Staff Sergeant (SSgt) K, and Corporal (Cpl) H encountered Cpl H’s girlfriend – the victim, a private first class – naked, in a cabana that she and Cpl H had rented. [read post]