Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 6001 - 6020 of 6,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2012, 9:34 am by admin
July 28, 2011) (granting preliminary injunction in part because employee acknowledged that breach of post-employment obligations would entitle employer to injunctive relief); Ayco Co., L.P. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:23 am by Neil Cahn
To begin, in its December 8, 2011 decision in Kirshy-Stallworth v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Kornreich’s legal analysis rejecting these arguments, and finding that the cited provisions unambiguously stripped the estate of all member rights save distributions, includes a detailed discussion of Delaware’s rules of contract construction when confronted with competing interpretations, which, she points out in a footnote, “grant courts more power [than under New York’s rules of construction] to rule on a contract’s meaning as a matter… [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Kornreich’s legal analysis rejecting these arguments, and finding that the cited provisions unambiguously stripped the estate of all member rights save distributions, includes a detailed discussion of Delaware’s rules of contract construction when confronted with competing interpretations, which, she points out in a footnote, “grant courts more power [than under New York’s rules of construction] to rule on a contract’s meaning as a matter… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987), a plurality of four justices concluded that something more was required--"an action of the defendant purposefully directed toward the forum state. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Similarly, a superior court judge remains entitled to earn pension rights on the same terms even if he is then appointed to the court of appeal: “The coach ticket punched in the 1964 appointment to the superior court continued to be good for passage in the parlor car of the court of appeal. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:14 am by R. David Donoghue
(Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco) Ecast, a former client of MoFo, sued the firm for malpractice. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am by Dan Harris
Plaintiff then sued defendants for fraud in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:09 am by Jason Rantanen
Does section 112(b), as construed by the Supreme Court in Nautilus v. [read post]