Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
In the Ninth Circuit, the Perfect 10 v. ccBill court held in 2007 that state IP claims, which would include publicity rights claims, are covered by Section 230. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held in this case, despite the agreement of both parties that the Ylst presumption should continue to apply. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:26 am
On April 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed a long-standing precedent when it held in Greathouse v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, Davoyan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:25 pm
As such, the teacher argued, she held no duty to the student under state law to make a report. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
Via SCOTUSBlog, the US Supreme Court today issued its ruling in Rothgery v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In Quesada v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:45 am
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTIONUnited States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 12:40 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
In Prins v Michigan State Police, the Court of Appeals held the actual mailing of a letter denying a Freedom of Information Act request, and not the composition of the letter, triggered the running of the 180-day period of limitation. [read post]
8 May 2025, 11:45 am
Colabianchi Construction, Inc., and Murfey v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which held that the Missouri state constitution which provides that “no money shall be taken from the public treasury, directly or indirectly, in aid of any church,” serves to disqualify a church from participating in a state program which makes state funds available to organizations to purchase recycled tires to resurface playgrounds. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
Dorozhko further illustrates the uncertain state of the limits of insider trading. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:14 pm
§ 465, state and local governments cannot tax permanent improvements built on non-reservation land owned by the United States and held in trust for an Indian Tribe, stating that: Under Mescalero, § 465’s exemption from state and local taxation applies to the permanent improvements on that land. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
In United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 1:09 pm
Held: The North Dakota Supreme Court held that Beylund’s consent was voluntary on the erroneous assumption that the state could permissibly compel both blood and breath tests. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 8:00 am
Further, the appeals court said that the district court properly treated the likelihood of confusion question as a matter of law, despite some earlier circuit rulings to the contrary (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
Farms, Ltd. v. [read post]
