Search for: "In re Bush" Results 6001 - 6020 of 6,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2007, 9:20 pm
(e) After the conclusion of the redeployment specified in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of Defense may not deploy or maintain members of the Armed Forces in Iraq for any purpose other than the following:(1) Protecting American diplomatic facilities and American citizens, including members of the U.S. armed forces;(2) Serving in roles consistent with customary diplomatic positions;(3) Engaging in targeted special actions limited in duration and scope to killing or capturing members of… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Second, on February 2, 2009, the Ohio AG announced that Gen Re had agreed to a $72 million settlement. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 1:36 am
"There's no expense to operating an Amber Alert system if you're doing it the right way. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
He issued 41 rulings between 1951 and 1962 in litigation known as Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Necessity can be answered in the LOAC by a status frame - they're all combatants and that's necessity enough. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 2:37 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The Obama, Bush, and Clinton administrations apparently believed that they were on firmer legal ground going after "combatants" in an "armed conflict," rather than relying on the customary law of self defense as an independent ground for the use of force. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
Some of the briefs we've seen attack the FDA's position as some sort of Bush administration conspiracy. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
") The judicial statements of what was sought by the prosecutors is illustrative of my point that as a realistic matter one cannot really separate reasons and acts into those that are protected and those that are not protected, because they're all mixed up together and in truth are one and the same: the evidence sought here is both the protected reason for a protected legislative act and the unprotected reason for an unprotected bribe. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:32 am
One Of These Mornings You're Going To Rise Up Singing (2007-02-28) Even though Curt Schilling is now blogging, Beth is still my favorite Sox blogger. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:58 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
At which point the Probation Officer could raise his or her hand to stop the person, and then go on to say something like this: "I hope you're right. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Bush.)The point is that the loss itself is the humiliation, and Trump will have many ways to deny the loss. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
In 2007, President Bush signed an Executive Order stating that the maximum punishment for rape and rape of a child was death. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
We also had President Bush telling us that the world was a better place because of the Iraq war. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
“What they’re claiming a patent on is how you think about whether or not a drug is working. [read post]
Bush’s campaign appointed him as their Catholic strategist.He frequently took leaves of absence from the Federalist Society to lead Justice campaigns, from Thomas to Barrett, becoming the Court’s conservative Catholic Justice-maker. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:48 am
Bush posted the most lopsided trackrecord, voting 50-4 against granting inmate appeals. [read post]