Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2" Results 6001 - 6020 of 13,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 1:23 pm by brian
" Today, the court ruled 6-2 that Fine exceeded his authority and ordered him to dismiss Green’s challenge. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:01 am by Rick Hasen
Without doubt, the Supreme Court’s most prominent decision so far under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts has been Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:24 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
If it does not, there is a strong presumption in favour of its constitutionality…. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
First, it cannot be squared with Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, which states: "The House of Representatives . . . shall have the sole power of Impeachment. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:48 pm by charonqc
This… I liked… John Drake | 10-Sep-2010 2:18 pm Just one point, I believe the Intermezzo blogger is female. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
Category: Claim Construction       By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleInterval Licensing LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
Souter and John Paul Stevens - have said that they do not support the 50-plus rule as the only measure of majority of a majority for purposes of a Section 2 vote-dilution claim. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:43 am
  The Court hasn’t ruled on the case yet, but when it does, it will also affect the FCC’s ruling in the famous Janet Jackson incident, which I discussed below: Just like people of our generation remember where they were the day John Kennedy was shot, and of the generation prior to that remembered where they were when Pearl Harbor was bombed, the current generations will no doubt remember where they were on September 11, 2001, and on February 1, 2004.… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 9:39 am by Charon QC
There is little in the way of hard law on the ‘fit and proper person’ test in relation to OfCom’s duties under  the Broadcasting Acts of 1990 and 1996 section 3(3) Ofcom: (a) “shall not grant a licence to any person unless satisfied that the person is “a fit and proper person to hold it”; and (b) “shall do all that they can to secure that, if they cease to be so satisfied in the case of any person holding a licence, that person does not remain… [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:10 am
Rather than repeat what already has been written, I'm just going to post the New York Times story in its entirety.Two questions: When does Damien Echols get out of prison and how many other innocent people are there on Arkansas' death row? [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:34 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
But in a series of six transactions in 2013, nearly $700,000 was funneled from previously unknown donors to a newly founded boutique law firm, Marquart & Small, which then passed the funds on to Pledge 2 Protect. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Why does it matter to them to prove originalism true if its substance has become so diluted? [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Folks, the IRS does not, and cannot, change the tax code. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:42 am
Otherwise, this factor would weigh in opposer’s favor in every Section 2(d) dispute. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 7:00 am by Paul L. Singer
It’s important to understand one’s obligations, especially under the INFORM Act, to ensure that you won’t get hit with both federal and state litigation. *** Be sure to join us this Thursday, October 19th as we meet with New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and his Consumer Protection office at 2:00 pm ET. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
The main reason for abolition is that the administrative fee overlaps with the additional fees and fees for further processing payable under Rule 51(2) and Article 121(1) EPC. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 12:52 pm by Guest Blogger
Michal Shur-OfryFor the Innovation Law Beyond IP 2 conference, March 28-29 at Yale Law SchoolWhat are your immediate associations to the word "innovation"? [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 5:45 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Prince stands at the corner of fair use and copyright infringementIn his motion, Prince placed himself in “a long line of [appropriation] artists” such as Marcel Duchamp, Jasper Johns and Jeff Koons. [read post]