Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 35,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am
Under the negotiation class approach, a class is identified—here it was all 34,458 cities and counties in the United States—and potential class members are asked upfront if they would like to opt out of the class. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick discusses a new court order that prohibits the government from enforcing a final rule that sought to increase filing fees for certain applications and petitions filed with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
See National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
” In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
United States The New York Times had a piece “American Could Face Prison in Thailand After Posting Negative Reviews of a Resort”. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:51 pm
United States, both liberal and conservative justices indicated the real limits on that delegation of power. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
"In his famous and highly influential concurrence in eBay v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
Ginsburg’s notable Supreme Court opinions include her majority opinion in the United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm
In general, courts evaluate the validity of a law that regulates expressive conduct under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United StatesBarr v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:23 pm
The injunction applies solely to the named plaintiffs and their members: the National Association of Manufacturers, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, the National Retail Federation, Technet and Intrax, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
The Law Library of Congress has had a long relationship with the Supreme Court of the United States and its justices. [read post]
