Search for: "Kat" Results 6001 - 6020 of 6,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 9:56 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  Lesson Six: Cinnamon Buns are More Important Than You Think One of the most important learning opportunities for me last year was Kat Cole's keynote speech at the LMA Annual Conference. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
This Kat has listed the claimants' main arguments to show the range of legal strings ISPs and IBPs tried to pull, ranging from intellectual property law, French civil liability law, civil procedures and constitutional rights. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
This issue is not confined to patents, Ann added, since the capacity to litigate IP applied also to trade marks, designs, copyrights and other IP rights.Next to speak was Maura O'Connell (FRKelly, where she is a partner of fellow Kat David). [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
The driving forces of information and communication technology have raced ahead so swiftly in the past decade and a half that words like 'metatag' have an almost prehistoric air to them. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
If you could not keep up, then join this Kat in catching up with a summary of what you missed (hopefully while sunbathing at the beach).Geographical Indications and Unfair CompetitionAnastasiia Kyrylenko reported on the recent opinion of Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona regarding the European Commission's competences in the examination of geographical indication applications (case C-579/23 P). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am by Léon Dijkman
The anti-suit injunction would thus have effectively amounted to a deprivation of IPCom's property [par. 58].To this Kat, the reasoning of the appeal court holds more appeal (no pun intended). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am by Marcel Pemsel
Comment In this Kat’s opinion, the EUIPO’s position that cross-IP priority claims must be limited to those explicitly mentioned in Art. 41(1) CDR appears to be more convincing. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
  But this year the moon wasn't quite right, so instead some Kat friends appeared in Chicago. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
Although there's still a long way to go, then, not all seems lost for the IPKat's couple of friends.A list of kat-posts mentioning the Bodurs here.The Bodurs' Facebook page here.The Bodurs' shop before and after this lawsuit. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:16 am by Chijioke Okorie
The Africa IP Highlights is an initiative of this Kat and is a series of posts put together to highlight some of the key developments in IP in Africa each year. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
"From IP to NP (Net Profit)" continued after a tasty and ample lunch break with a further parallel session, with the first pair of topics offered a choice between enforcing rights and getting them in the first place: 1 (for IP Professionals) Enforcement of IP Rights in US, Europe, Asia and Israel    2 (for entrepreneurs and IP managers) Seminar on IP Rights Registration in a Constantly Changing World, Part A: Claim Construction & Implications  Again, this… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:01 am
A few days ago, the European Commission launched a public consultation, running from 20 February 2013 to 17 May 2013, on draft proposals for a revised Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation (TTBER) and revised Guidelines for the application of Article 101(3) TFEU to technology transfer agreements. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
 The Kats are all grateful to Katfriend and occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing) for teasing out the relevant facts and explaining them so succinctly here:Factual Background SDL Hair Ltd v Next Row Ltd & others [2014] EWHC 2084 is the inquiry as to damages judgment of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, that followed the decision of 14 June 2013 on liability by Mr Recorder Richard Meade QC [noted on PatLit here]. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Eleonora Rosati
After all, the one at issue in the present case is an advertisement – and advertising is one of the types of uses specifically indicated by law as being potentially infringing.According to the Supreme Court, thus, the key issue is not really whether the use of a sign is done in the course of trade, but rather whether it is use thereof as a trade mark.And here comes the interesting bit: according to the court, it is erroneous to think that a trade mark – especially a well-known one - is… [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  In the consequentials hearing judgment [2023] EWHC 138 , the Judge dealt with (1) royalty payments; (2) costs; (3) confidentiality; and (4) permission to appeal.Of the most interesting to this Kat was the treatment of costs (well, some of them), confidentiality and permission to appeal. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 1:47 am
Other Kats may be having their say on this decision too ... [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am by Eleonora Rosati
by Adrian Aronsson-StorrierAlso Kats believe inand wish for many things ...The Equality Act does not define religion or belief, with the explanatory note making clear belief has a broad definition, and one consistent with the rights guaranteed under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 36 [week ending Sunday 8 March] - EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) says Chairman can disobey | OHIM is too rich to be true | eLAW’s TM infringement checklist | Human right and IP | Again on Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Seiko and Seiki in Singapore | The politics of US patent law reform | Haribo v Lindt Goldbear wars | Patent trolls | Private copying | Wu-Tank and copyright | CJEU on private copying in Copydan |… [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
The IPKat specially commissioned Fordham Senior Research and Conference Fellow Daan Erikson to write up some notes on the conference's competition law stream which, on account of there being so many other attractions that he was obliged to attend, the Kat was obliged to forgo. [read post]