Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 6001 - 6020 of 6,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 8:43 pm
The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog had an update last Friday about the status of class action lawsuits filed by aggrieved consumers (in other words, by class action attorneys who've "discovered" lead plaintiffs) to punish merchants who left too much... [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:51 pm
Rejection of a facial challenge means that it is still open to individual plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs to explain how the law discriminates unfairly against them given their particular circumstances and should not be applied to them. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:34 am
We hope this dialogue will lead to an agreeable outcome. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 7:21 am
For example, public pension funds were named lead plaintiff in 14 of 25 securities class action cases filed in 2007 where a lead plaintiff was appointed. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:25 am
The package showed pictures of oranges, cherries, and strawberries, but the leading ingredients are corn syrup and sugar. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:31 am
There are Plaintiffs: An Empirical Analysis of Securities Class Action Settlements, 61 Vand. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:05 pm
Avoiding this issue could eliminate friction at the lead plaintiff, motion to dismiss, and class certification stages. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:28 pm
(In WV&Z’s view, ‘participation’ is moving to be and, once appointed, acting as lead plaintiff and not the just filling out and filing of a settlement claim form.) [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Will outsourcing and globalization in general (permitting work to be done in the lowest-cost jurisdiction, be that IT and HR support, or paralegal or e-discovery services) supplant the model of teams of extremely high-priced and highly educated professionals operating out of Class AAA space in the center of the world's financial capitals? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 6:53 pm
Class counsel have asked the court (.pdf) to approve $25 million in fees and costs, including incentive awards for named plaintiffs of $2,500 to $10,000 apiece. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:52 pm
Notably, the certification denies Co-Lead Plaintiff Avalon Holdings Inc., an institutional investor based in Greece, being a member of the class. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:53 am
"[N]o liability exists where a plaintiff's claim rests on the assumption that the defendants must have known of the severity of their problems earlier because conditions became so bad later on," wrote the trial court.The 1st Circuit rejected this conclusion, however, because the district court failed to consider other allegations that the lead plaintiff made in its supporting documents. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
" Id. at *16.The FDA's 2007 class revisions to SSRI labeling. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
If you intend to start in private practice, then I would suggest that you focus your job search on the leading advertising law firms. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
  Most interestingly, Lead Plaintiff took the muddled reasoning in Stoneridge and used it affirmatively. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:18 am
Superior Court, 40 Cal.4th 360, 373 (Cal. 2007), which stated that "Contact information regarding the identity of potential class members is generally discoverable, so that the lead plaintiff may learn the names of other persons who might assist in prosecuting the case. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:01 am
As a Class II medical device, the DRX 9000 is only eligible for FDA "clearance," not approval, which is a separate procedure for Class III devices. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:40 pm
GMAC, the court has struck down the annihilation argument, leading to several FACTA class action certifications. [read post]