Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In Shevill v Presse Alliance ([1996] AC 959 and [1995] ECR I-415) it was held that publication of defamatory material in this jurisdiction is a “harmful event” for the purposes of Art. 5(3). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Toutefois, puisqu’il était préoccupé par les délais d’enquête, il s’est permis d’interrompre la conversation qui n’était pas terminée afin de signaler que l’alcootest était prêt et que l’appelante devait «raccrocher». [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
On one side of that clear line lay a range of actions not prohibited by the Hatch Act; on the other side lay the range of prohibited actions that could never have a connection to his Chief of Staff duties. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
In Patel v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
But Parliament has recognised, by refraining from laying down strict rules, that the situations that may confront the local authority will vary from case to case and that it would be unreasonable to prescribe one solution that must be adopted in all cases. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
But Parliament has recognised, by refraining from laying down strict rules, that the situations that may confront the local authority will vary from case to case and that it would be unreasonable to prescribe one solution that must be adopted in all cases. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am
In the case of Perry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Although the Second Circuit may have gotten to the right legal result (given the constraints under which lower courts operate), there is one aspect of its reasoning that I believe reflects a common and dangerous misunderstanding (an overreading, actually) of the highly contested Obamacare ruling, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Hilliard v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Kurzban, Annie Lai, Christopher N. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm
When we discussed this at interview you acknowledged that the circular window was in fact much larger than the circular window in your prison cell, and that the only similarity lay in the fact that both were circular. 44. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
Au surplus, l’argument selon lequel l’article 2926.1 C.C.Q. ne s’applique pas en l’espèce ne peut être retenu à l’étape de l’autorisation puisque l’intimée relie les dommages moraux qu’elle a vécus à l’omission de protection et de réconfort des appelantes à la suite des agressions sexuelles dont elle a été victime. [read post]
