Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 88,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
InBuhuceanu and Others v Romania [2023] ECHR 424, the applicants were 21 same-sex couples who argued that the absence of any form of legal recognition for their relationships was a violation of Article 8 ECHR (respect for private and family life). [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] A Lawyer's Filing "Is Replete with Citations to Non-Existent Cases"—Thanks, ChatGPT?
26 May 2023, 10:46 pm
He further states that the docket number appearing on the "opinion" furnished by plaintiff's counsel, Docket No. 18-13694, is for a case captioned George Cornea v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:11 pm
As we discuss in detail in this post, the state Supreme Court set a high standard for vicarious liability in the 2015 case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:05 pm
[1] Sackett v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:52 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
See Chafin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:20 pm
’s birth, the parties learned that they could legally move to the United States if Petitioner became a “skilled worker,” which he could do by becoming a nurse. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:19 pm
See Navani v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:16 pm
Rodriguez Sanchez was not legally in the United States and was not able to return to North Carolina. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:14 pm
Respondent appealed the December 30, 2021 Order, and the Ninth Circuit remanded for consideration of the recently decided United States Supreme Court case Golan v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm
Petitioner and Respondent were currently legally married and were married at the time of the minor child’s birth The Parties resided together with the minor child in their marital home in Brandon, Manitoba, Canada, from around the time she was born through the date that Respondent and the minor child traveled to the United States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:11 pm
” Rath v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:09 pm
[Germany][Petitioners motion to dismiss granted] In Krause v Krause 2023 WL 2541912 (E.D. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:08 pm
However, in Monasky v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:07 pm
State Police Pension Tr. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:04 pm
Darin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In implementing the Convention, ICARA sets forth conditions for “[a]ny person” to file a petition for relief, and defines person to include “any ... institution, or other legal entity or body .... [read post]
