Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 51,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
One part of my Foreword is an investigation into the role of race in two of the Court’s biggest cases last Term—New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 am
In McMillin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:40 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
(See People v Casey, supra; see also People v Miles, 64 NY2d 731 [1984] [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
In Nemmers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
In People v Orlewicz, No. 285672, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s order granting a new trial and affirmed the defendant’s convictions and sentences in charges arising from a murder. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
The companion case is the Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:58 am
In Durr v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:58 am
In Durr v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:53 pm
Yet in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Warger v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
March 28, 2024) This case involves the same allegations as the GG v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
In that respect, this case is more analogous to our holding in People v Johnson (14 NY3d 483 [2010]). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
29 May 2009, 9:39 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 7:38 pm
Emboldened by the Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:48 am
We were part of a landmark 2008 decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
