Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 6001 - 6020 of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Task Force heard concerns from experts and stakeholders about the impact of cannabis use in the workplace; particularly for people working in safety-sensitive positions. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am by Michael Geist
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:50 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
Changes such as the child aging and interacting with new people at home were not deemed sufficient to prove a material change Here’s another example: in the case of Gillespie v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” In a somewhat anomalous situation, under this law a freelance worker might also become a “hiring party” if he or she (or his or her LLC or sole proprietorship) retains another “freelance worker” to assist in rendering services. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Then why has a Congress—filled, by definition, with ambitious people—failed so miserably to counteract Trump? [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm by Jodie Liu
This is hardly bulk collection in the sense that worries Glenn Greewald and others, but would seem to be precluded by a law that restricts collection to the identification of individual accounts or people. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am by Alden Abbott
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
., a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, to resolve charges related to the company’s “allegedly false and misleading disclosures about the safety of its dams prior to the January 2019 collapse of the Brumadinho dam that killed 270 people. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
This was characterised by Lord Pannick in House of Lords debate as the bringing of proceedings ‘by people who have no connection to t [read post]