Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 6001 - 6020 of 7,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
Peter Sherwood’s ruling last month in Matter of Goyal (Vintage India NYC, LLC), 2018 NY Slip Op 31926(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 7, 2018]. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Peter Collier,  ‘50 Years of Safeguarding – 950 Years of Clergy Discipline: Where do we go from here? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:11 am by Doug Allen
 For support in extending such a paradigm to design professionals, the plaintiff relied on Peters v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by WSLL
StateCitation: 2010 WY 27Docket Number: S-09-0055Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, Honorable Peter G. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am by INFORRM
He rightly points out that companies – by which he means trading companies – “already have a wide range of legal means to protect their brand and to prevent unfair competition” and draws attention to the notorious cases in which companies have brought (and, importantly, threatened) libel actions against individuals: the McLibel litigation, British Chiropractic Association v Singh, General Electric Healthcare v Professor Henrik Thomsen and the still ongoing… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Peter Dutton has sought leave to appeal in the high court against his loss in the defamation case he brought against Shane Bazzi, questioning whether there had been a “miscarriage of justice. [read post]
The UK’s inventive step assessment is set out in Pozzoli Spa v BDMO SA & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 588 and may be seen as a somewhat abbreviated assessment of inventive step compared with the EPO’s three-step more rigorous problem-solution approach. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:12 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Peter Vogel of Gardere Wynne Sewell also said that a good line to draw when using social media is to avoid saying anything that you don't want a jury to see. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 2:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J conducted a PTR in the case of Clarke v Guardian News and Media. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Nolan to Go Out On Limb In Kleen Products Predictive Coding Case - bit.ly/HGgMfD (Matthew Nelson) Proportionality Demystified: How Organizations Can Get eDiscovery Right by Following Four Key Principles – http://bit.ly/IUFds3 (Philip Favro) Redefine Transparency in Predictive Coding: Shoot for Validity - bit.ly/HL7PhL (Gerard Britton) Robinson v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Peter Saidel reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]