Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 6001 - 6020 of 12,944
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The DCA disagreed, finding that “IRCA does not contain express preemption language nor does it so thoroughly occupy the field as to require a reasonable inference that Congress left no room for states to act,” moreover, the United States Supreme Court considers workers’ compensation an area where states have authority to regulate under their police powers. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am by INFORRM
Developments culminating in the GDPR have put these two very different fields on a collision course — but they lack a common vocabulary and are in many cases animated by different goals. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:18 pm by D. Daxton White
The objective of this show is to pass along some of the information that I’ve learned in that role to sort of try to arm investors with what I think would be valuable information in evening the playing field between the investor and the broker. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
And while much work remains to be done, this law represents a serious effort to equalize the playing field for women in New York. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Now, that includes the contentious field known as neuromarketing – or in this case, neuropolitics. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
City of Burlington 15-156Issue: Whether the Federal Aviation Act preempts all state and local general land-use regulation aimed at addressing off-site airport noise, as the Vermont Supreme Court and other state high courts have held, or whether it preempts only those state and local general land-use regulations that conflict with federal law or intrude into a preempted field in their scope and effect, as the Second Circuit and several other federal courts of… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:09 pm by Kevin
Nov. 20, 2007) (bonus points: caption describes the defendant as “an entity of unknown form”) Field of Screams, LLC v. [read post]