Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 6,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 3:16 am
This seems to be a case that turns on its evidence and it's certainly not an Arsenal v Reed situation: if the CBD badge was never used as a trade mark and has been regularly copied by shirt replica sellers, it is difficult to see how the trade mark's validity could be upheld.Right: Wayne the shirtless football cat, available from Lorna BaileyMerpel adds, if the trade mark had been valid, it would have been fun to contrast this case (replica shirts, which are full-sized… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:25 am
YoungelmanAlso see Walters v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
In Miles v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 am
City of New York RICHMOND COUNTYContractsMere Shipment of Goods by eBay Seller to New York Did Not Qualify as Sole Basis for Personal Jurisdiction Sayeedi v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:37 am
Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:12 am
RICHMOND COUNTYReal PropertyBuyer Fails to Prove Fraud by Seller; Court Cannot Accept Unlicensed Inspector's Testimony as Expert Brady v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
.
Newly Named Interim Dean Is First Woman to Lead Hofstra Law
New York Law Journal
Professor Nora V. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 5:50 am
" Taylor v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
The Tony Twist case, Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
He is also interested in the Consumer Reports question: why does CR get NYT v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 9:03 am
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Wrap sheet: DVF sues eBay seller over allegedly fake dressesDunkxchange trade show for vintage NIKEs sparked by fake sales onlineThese questions three: Adidas v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
"Recreational dancing is not a form of expression protected by the federal or state constitutions," the court wrote.But, according to the plurality of the SCOTUS in Barnes v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
Co. of Amer. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:57 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 6:20 pm
US v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
Well, now there is: Today, the Court of Appeal decided in Duale v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:13 pm
[4] Elston v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 4:31 am
" Garfield v. [read post]
